Mainstream Exposes New 'Dangers' of Vitamin E...         
  Dear Reader,  
Sometimes the mainstream media acts like a hulking, simple- minded, Frankenstein.   
Here's the latest from "Frank" on vitamin E: "Vitamin E  cause stroke. Me no like stroke. Me no like vitamin E!  Argh!"    
Thanks, big guy. That's really...not helpful at all.    
Botched headlines    
With headlines such as, "Vitamin E increases risk of  internal bleeding stroke," and "Vitamin E could trigger a  stroke," the mainstream media has, once again, completely  botched the reporting.    
For instance, here's what one newspaper article reported:  "It turns out that taking Vitamin E, while reducing risk of  ischemic stroke by about 10 per cent, actually increases  risk of the more-dangerous hemorrhagic stroke by 22  per cent."    
Well, no, it doesn't "turn out" — as if, finally, this is  the end of the story. And there's zero evidence that a  quality vitamin E supplement would "actually increase risk"  of hemorrhagic stroke.    
This vitamin E news isn't based on a clinical trial. It was  a meta-analysis of several clinical trials, so it's open to  all kinds of interpretation.    
And you know who saw right through all that? The newspaper  readers! It was like they became a mob of angry villagers,  grabbing torches and pitchforks to go after the mainstream  Frankenstein.    
In the comment section included with the blog article,  several readers asked about the forms of vitamin E used and  the dosages. In comment after comment there are intelligent  questions that SHOULD have been raised by the blogger, who  instead just parroted the conclusion of the study.    
So what's the real deal with the meta-analysis? Well, it's a  mess. As usual!    
First of all, many of the subjects in these studies weren't  at all healthy to begin with.    
One study enrolled only smokers — more than 28,000! That's a  HUGE cohort already at risk of stroke. Another study  recruited only subjects who had experienced cardiovascular  disease events. And in two studies, a combined total of more  than 17,500 subjects were at high risk of cardiovascular  disease.    
And vitamin E played a role in their strokes? Riiiight...    
From very bad to much worse!    
Of the nine studies included in the analysis, four of them  used a synthetic form of E known as dl-alpha. Which is  simply junk. In fact, Dr. Spreen recommends that dl-alpha  only be used topically because, over time, it may actually  do harm when taken internally.    
The subjects in those four "synthetic" studies accounted for  about half of all the subjects in the combined studies.  Which means that half of this meta-analysis is based on  junk.    
So here's the ACCURATE headline for any media report on this  study: "Junk form of vitamin E may slightly increase stroke  risk among unhealthy patients."    
Honestly, I don't have all the numbers, so my made-up  headline is possibly misleading. But I'll bet it's more  accurate than the blatantly absurd headlines suggesting that  any vitamin E supplement increases hemorrhagic stroke risk.    
You can put a torch to that one and stick a pitchfork in it. 
Continues below...   
 
      
 
 Mark Haub has come up with a diet plan that seems to have  been designed by a seven-year-old.    
Haub is a professor of human nutrition at Kansas State  University, in the US. He recently went on a weight-loss diet  that strictly limited his calorie intake to 1,800 per day.    
But most of those calories came from cakes, biscuits and  other 'unhealthy' treats. He also consumed one protein shake  per day, some low-calorie vegetables, and a multivitamin.    
The results were impressive: He lost nearly 30 pounds in two  months. And this is a guy whose previous weight-loss  attempts with healthy diets were unsuccessful.    
Haub says he wanted to show his students that pure calorie  counting is the secret to a successful diet. Consume fewer  calories than you burn and you'll drop the pounds.    
Okay, he lost weight, but other health problems sprang up,  right?    
Wrong.    
What's genuinely bewildering is that Haub's 'good'  cholesterol increased by 20 per cent, his 'bad' dropped by  the same amount, and his triglycerides dropped even more  significantly — by nearly 40 per cent!    
Haub is shaking his head in wonder at those three  developments. He recognizes that the diet should be  unhealthy, but as he told CNN, "The data doesn't say that."    
Okay, so he lost weight, and his heart-health markers all  went in the right direction, but he must have felt awful,  right?    
Wrong.    
Haub says the first day was the worst, but after that he  began to feel better and better. In fact, his nightly sleep  apnoea problem was so dramatically reduced that his general  quality of life improved.    
Maybe it's time to buy stock in  a cake company!   
Haub limited his diet to 10 weeks, so we can only guess what  the long-term results might be. I think they would be  disastrous, with a complete reversal of those heart-health  numbers and onset of type 2 diabetes.